|
Message: In Reply to: Re: this pawprint thing posted by Bourbon on May 23, 1998 at 00:58:12: Of course, this was done by Terry AFTER the fact, which certainly suggests that he had no intent of ever acknowledging the sources UNLESS caught. Seems to me that if Terry didn't want to present original information in the areas where he used copied writing, maybe he should have had a "recommended reading" list in the first place. I for one would RATHER "go to the source." It seems to me that Pawprint WANTS to share their information and knowledge. After all, they do have a web site and go to the expense and trouble of publishing a newsletter (which I am on the mailing list for and think is great). They just don't want it re-used such as it has been here. What is really wrong with that?
| ||||||
|
||||||
Home
Glider Gossip
Gliderpedia
Journals
Resources