Message:

Subject: Re: Vermifax, and Annoyed
Posted by Vermifax on September 13, 1998 at 20:13:07:

In Reply to: Vermifax, and Annoyed posted by Bourbon on September 13, 1998 at 05:43:37:

Bourbon, I do not have any issue with you other than the way
you act towards people asking questions. I love my glider, Dexter,
and would do much for him, however he is not more important than
any single human being on this planet.

I would commend you on your ability to research my posts and
pull quotes out of context.

1. WATER (I would assume you are refering to my post)

"I am pretty sure that they are talking about under Running
water, not submerging them. This would not be any more
damage to the glider physically than a bath, however I
would still not advocate it since my Dexter really hates
baths. (Had to give him two. 1)Fell in his glideraide
2) Bad Diahrrea ) "

*note - I specifically advocated against putting them under
running water.

2.Throwing (I assume you are talking about my post)
"I am not talking about throwing it hard enough to break it's back.
I am talking about tossing it between me and my wife. Dexter loves it. We stand three maybe 4 feet apart
and if we don't toss him he looks back up at us as if to say ' well what are you
waiting for?' "

*note - Dexter has not stopped LIKING to be tossed back and forth.

3. Helpful information (I assume you are talking about my post)
" I see less and less real information
about Sugar gliders every time I look on this page. We should just
name this current set of posts the 'Negative things about Gliders' archive."

*note I didn't say there is no helpful information on this board
I regularly look through the archives here to answer question people
ask me. I said I am seeing less and less.

4. Death with no apparent reason. (I did say this)

With appologies to Sherry. Her little one Peek died. She
had a necropsy done and it revealed he died from liver failure.
Now ok granted we have Peek's cause of death. Yet, we don't know
why Peek's liver failed. Hence no apparent reason.

Another assumption you make about me is that I have not read
every post of yours. I have read every post on this board and
the archives and was reading this board before your first ever
post. I am not saying this makes me an expert. I have never
started a new post just for the purpose of 'slamming' you. I have
only posted when I felt that users were being attacked because of
their opinions about the people answering their questions. I in
no way mean to single out you Bourbon, you are just the most
vocal person on the board at the moment.

To close and to quote your post:
"...being harsh, rude, and insensitive. I at least have been trying
to help." You do not deny that you have been harsh rude and insensitive.
I maintain that when you are harsh, rude and insensitive, you are NOT
trying to help.

Vermifax

Follow Ups: