Message:

Subject: Re:in response
Posted by Kim on May 19, 1998 at 22:36:17:

In Reply to: Re:in response posted by David at PAWPRINT on May 19, 1998 at 19:40:59:

": The other response that seems to keep coming up is that, for some reason, it must be Pawprint's responsibility to read through the entire web site looking for copyrighted material. There is no simple way to do this. We would have to either sit online or print out the whole site (which brings up new copyright issues), then go through it line by line. Then, I guess, we would have to email specific line and sentence references to the WebMaster, so that he could then go through line by line and delete the necessary passages. This certainly doesn't seem a very reaslistic expectation to me, and is not something which we should have to do."

Out of curiosity David, what, exactly do you think all of us who volunteered to help Terry had to do to find the copyrighted info?I have just spent 3 hours on your website (which I swore I'd never hit again) to go through it all. Granted, it shouldn't have been here. People that helped him the first time put it here, and should have known better, or at least informed him. But if you noticed things that you recognized on this site, obviously you had some idea as to which things were copyright infringements. You just didn't waste the effort on giving him any clue.
Your words are all printed out, and have been compared, (you have my email address above if you would like to mention me to your corporate lawyer and sue me for printing your pages out for comparison), and will be forwarded to Terry immediately.

Kim

Follow Ups:

• Re:in response Marmalito 02:50:16 5/20/98 (2)
  • I don't think Terry ever said this was his original work...I think all he said was here it is...for your consideration.....n/m Jumpher 19:09:09 5/20/98 (0)
  • I don't think Terry ever said this was his original work...I think all he said was here it is...for your consideration.....n/m Jumpher 19:08:47 5/20/98 (0)